Quickphotos For Google 1 1 5
Make your living room more lively with EasyCloud for Google Photos. Bring your stored memories and pictures from Google Photos to life on Apple TV. Browse your albums and pictures. All your albums/photos are beautifully presented and elegantly arranged for a large display like TV. Some of the grea. QuickPHOTO CAMERA is a basic version of QuickPHOTO microscope software developed by PROMICRA since 2004. It is designed for the acquisition of digital images from microscopes, measuring, editing, annotating and saving of acquired images and measurements.
Quickphotos For Google 1 1 5
Quickphotos For Google 1 1 50
Quickphotos For Google 1 1 5th
CANBERRA, Australia (AP) Australias government said on Tuesday it will amend draft laws that would make Google and Facebook pay for news to clarify that publishers would be paid in lump sums rather than per click on news article links.
The legislative changes described in a government statement as clarifications and technical amendments follow Australian ministers weekend discussions with Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg and Sundar Pichai, chief executive of Alphabet Inc. and its subsidiary Google. Affinity designer 1 4 0 vector graphic design software . Antares autotune 4 vst.
The conservative government hopes to enact the so-called News Media Bargaining Code before the current session of Parliament ends on Feb. 25.
The amendments to be introduced to Parliament on Wednesday improve the workability of the code while retaining its overall effect, Treasurer Josh Frydenberg and Communications Minister Paul Fletcher said in a joint statement.
The opposition center-left Labor Party agreed at a meeting of lawmakers on Tuesday to support the bill, guaranteeing its passage through the Senate where the government does not hold a majority of seats. But the government might have to compromise with further Senate amendments.
Australia Institutes Center for Responsible Technology, a think-tank that supports the proposed world-first legislation, accepted the proposed changes.
On face value, the amendments keep the integrity of the media code intact, the centers director Peter Lewis said in a statement. Mocha premiere pro .
A Senate committee that scrutinized the draft legislation after it was introduced to Parliament on Dec. 9 recommended last week that the code become law without changes.
Google and Facebook, which take a combined 81 of online advertising in Australia, have condemned the bill as unworkable.
Google has threatened to make its search engine unavailable in Australia if the code were introduced. Facebook said it might block Australians from sharing news if the platform were forced to pay for news.
The code aims to remove the digital giants dominant bargaining positions but creating an arbitration panel with the power to make legally binding decisions on price. The panel would usually accept either the platforms or the publishers best offer, and only rarely set a price in between.
That should discourage both the platforms and media businesses from making unrealistic demands.
Apart from stating that arbitrated payments to publishers must be made in lump sums, the new amendments also clarify that the panel must consider costs incurred by the platforms and by news businesses.
Seven West Media on Monday became the largest Australian news media business to strike a deal with Google to pay for journalism. Kerry Stokes, chairman of Seven West Media, which owns 21 publications, said the threat of the proposed code had made the deal possible.
The deal was struck under Googles own model, News Showcase. The company has reached pay deals with more than 450 publications globally since it launched News Showcase in October.
Google announced two weeks ago that it had begun paying seven far smaller Australian websites under News Showcase.
The Australian government said: It is encouraging to see recent reports that news media businesses and digital platforms are now reaching commercial agreements, against the backdrop of the code being introduced into Parliament.
Google has faced pressure from authorities elsewhere to pay for news. Last month, it signed a deal with a group of French publishers, paving the way for the company to make digital copyright payments. Under the agreement, Google will negotiate individual licensing deals with newspapers, with payments based on factors such as the amount published daily and monthly internet site traffic.
About a month ago, Andrew Stadel sent me the following set of dot images and asked for thoughts:
Of course, being accustomed to doing Quick Images through Investigations, my first thoughts were around what this would look like as a sequence of images. I sent him this reply:
Are you thinking of these being shown one after the other.like image, discuss how many and how you saw it, next image, discuss how many and how you saw it, next imageetc? Or are you thinking of using them as stand alone dot images? I am not even sure if that impacts my thinking around the purpose, but here are my initial thoughts (but I do want to think about this a bit more)
Now, while I am used to Quick Images, they do not have these yellow and red counters that the students use a lot in the younger grades. That made my begin to split my thoughts into how I may use them for 3-5 versus K-2. So, my thoughts to Andrew continued like this. For my 3rd 5th I would love to show these in a progression as I could possibly be focusing on three things:
How they think about the red vs yellow (the two colors, it screams distributive to me).
If they create an array and subtract out missing, visually move the dots to create a nicer image, or if they build in parts.
How the recordings connectI typically ask Where is ___ in ___? For example in the second image a student could see 2 x 4 +1=9 while another could see 4 + 5 =9 so where is 4+ 5 in 2 x 4 + 1? Well if we decompose that 5 into 4+1, we have 4+4+1 = 2x 4+1 .Those conversations are probably my favorite with this stuff!
K-2 I am still really learning a lot about and full disclaimer, in my purposes with them, I typically lean toward making connections to 10 (100 for 2nd) and comparisons. If my purpose was to see how they see the dots, recreating the image, and counting this progression would be perfectespecially that last one!! However, if my purpose was to have them compare (more or less) and then creating a proof, I would have the second image to build upon the first.like maybe add a yellow on the top an bottom of the first imageso the first one they say, I saw 4 (of course we ask how they saw that four) then 2 and 2 and 2. We ask how could we record that? 4 + 2+2+2 = 10. First flash of the second image, Is it more or less than the first? How do you know? Second flash of the Quickphotos For Google 1 1 5 image, how many, how did you know? did you know it before I flashed it the second time? I would imagine most would do 10 + 2 very quickly and know it before the second flash. Could be cool to ask how we could use 14 counters in the next image and have them design the 14th.
After chatting with Elham, Graham, and Andrew, it was interesting to see the different ways we each looked at the images. (Joe Schwartz conveyed his thoughts to Graham, so I was able to hear those as well) There were distinct differences of when the color of the dot mattered to each of us and when it didnt as well as a difference of how we arranged the dots to make them easier to count.
These were the things that jumped out at me when I counted each one
Image 1: Color of the dots mattered. I saw red and yellow, 4+5=9. The arrangement made no difference to me.
Spin palace casino online . Image 2: Color was irrelevant to me. I squished it together to make is a 3 x4 array with one missing. Arrangement mattered here and I built up to the total.
Edgeview 2 v2 62 . Image 3: Again, color irrelevant to me. I saw the array and subtracted out the missing parts.
Image 4: I didnt know what to do with but the colors played an important way in which I saw the total. I needed to have those reds to easily see how many missing dots I had to subtract out from my total. So in this one arrangement and color both mattered.
Now, in planning to use this with a third grade class who have not officially started their unit on multiplication and arrays, I was curious most about how they would approach the 3rd and 4th image. Because I wanted to push them to be thinking about combining without having to count by ones, I decided to do them as quick images where I flashed the image for about 3-5 seconds and then covered it back up. I did that twice before taking any answers. In the 3rd image, I wanted to see if the colors of the counters made any difference to them or the arrangement was more important. How did they see the dots and how did they combine and then talk about the way they combined?
The 4th image, I will be honest, I didnt know what to do with it at first. I knew I couldnt spend the entire class period with it up there because it was a part of a number talk that I wanted to take about 15 minutes. I had to think about what I really wanted to see the students thinking about when looking at the image. Four things came to mind Quickphotos For Google 1 1 50
Could they come up with an estimate after one flash of the image or two?
What did they look for when given two flashes of the image. Were they counting rows and columns like the work they would soon be doing in the array work of the multiplication unit?
What did they look for on the second flash? Were they looking for the missing pieces first or second?
Could the students be metacognitive to think about what they were doing each time the image flashed and understand how they counted each time?
I had the chance to go into the classroom, do the Quick Images and film it! Because of time and length of this post already, I am going to leave you with this planning stage and post what I saw tomorrow!
In the meantime, you can play around with what you think 3rd graders would do with these images OR suggest other ways we could use them at various grade levels! Quickphotos For Google 1 1 5th
To be continued.
Quickphotos For Google 1 1 5
Quickphotos For Google 1 1 50
Quickphotos For Google 1 1 5th
CANBERRA, Australia (AP) Australias government said on Tuesday it will amend draft laws that would make Google and Facebook pay for news to clarify that publishers would be paid in lump sums rather than per click on news article links.
The legislative changes described in a government statement as clarifications and technical amendments follow Australian ministers weekend discussions with Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg and Sundar Pichai, chief executive of Alphabet Inc. and its subsidiary Google. Affinity designer 1 4 0 vector graphic design software . Antares autotune 4 vst.
The conservative government hopes to enact the so-called News Media Bargaining Code before the current session of Parliament ends on Feb. 25.
The amendments to be introduced to Parliament on Wednesday improve the workability of the code while retaining its overall effect, Treasurer Josh Frydenberg and Communications Minister Paul Fletcher said in a joint statement.
The opposition center-left Labor Party agreed at a meeting of lawmakers on Tuesday to support the bill, guaranteeing its passage through the Senate where the government does not hold a majority of seats. But the government might have to compromise with further Senate amendments.
Australia Institutes Center for Responsible Technology, a think-tank that supports the proposed world-first legislation, accepted the proposed changes.
On face value, the amendments keep the integrity of the media code intact, the centers director Peter Lewis said in a statement. Mocha premiere pro .
A Senate committee that scrutinized the draft legislation after it was introduced to Parliament on Dec. 9 recommended last week that the code become law without changes.
Google and Facebook, which take a combined 81 of online advertising in Australia, have condemned the bill as unworkable.
Google has threatened to make its search engine unavailable in Australia if the code were introduced. Facebook said it might block Australians from sharing news if the platform were forced to pay for news.
The code aims to remove the digital giants dominant bargaining positions but creating an arbitration panel with the power to make legally binding decisions on price. The panel would usually accept either the platforms or the publishers best offer, and only rarely set a price in between.
That should discourage both the platforms and media businesses from making unrealistic demands.
Apart from stating that arbitrated payments to publishers must be made in lump sums, the new amendments also clarify that the panel must consider costs incurred by the platforms and by news businesses.
Seven West Media on Monday became the largest Australian news media business to strike a deal with Google to pay for journalism. Kerry Stokes, chairman of Seven West Media, which owns 21 publications, said the threat of the proposed code had made the deal possible.
The deal was struck under Googles own model, News Showcase. The company has reached pay deals with more than 450 publications globally since it launched News Showcase in October.
Google announced two weeks ago that it had begun paying seven far smaller Australian websites under News Showcase.
The Australian government said: It is encouraging to see recent reports that news media businesses and digital platforms are now reaching commercial agreements, against the backdrop of the code being introduced into Parliament.
Google has faced pressure from authorities elsewhere to pay for news. Last month, it signed a deal with a group of French publishers, paving the way for the company to make digital copyright payments. Under the agreement, Google will negotiate individual licensing deals with newspapers, with payments based on factors such as the amount published daily and monthly internet site traffic.
About a month ago, Andrew Stadel sent me the following set of dot images and asked for thoughts:
Of course, being accustomed to doing Quick Images through Investigations, my first thoughts were around what this would look like as a sequence of images. I sent him this reply:
Are you thinking of these being shown one after the other.like image, discuss how many and how you saw it, next image, discuss how many and how you saw it, next imageetc? Or are you thinking of using them as stand alone dot images? I am not even sure if that impacts my thinking around the purpose, but here are my initial thoughts (but I do want to think about this a bit more)
Now, while I am used to Quick Images, they do not have these yellow and red counters that the students use a lot in the younger grades. That made my begin to split my thoughts into how I may use them for 3-5 versus K-2. So, my thoughts to Andrew continued like this. For my 3rd 5th I would love to show these in a progression as I could possibly be focusing on three things:
How they think about the red vs yellow (the two colors, it screams distributive to me).
If they create an array and subtract out missing, visually move the dots to create a nicer image, or if they build in parts.
How the recordings connectI typically ask Where is ___ in ___? For example in the second image a student could see 2 x 4 +1=9 while another could see 4 + 5 =9 so where is 4+ 5 in 2 x 4 + 1? Well if we decompose that 5 into 4+1, we have 4+4+1 = 2x 4+1 .Those conversations are probably my favorite with this stuff!
K-2 I am still really learning a lot about and full disclaimer, in my purposes with them, I typically lean toward making connections to 10 (100 for 2nd) and comparisons. If my purpose was to see how they see the dots, recreating the image, and counting this progression would be perfectespecially that last one!! However, if my purpose was to have them compare (more or less) and then creating a proof, I would have the second image to build upon the first.like maybe add a yellow on the top an bottom of the first imageso the first one they say, I saw 4 (of course we ask how they saw that four) then 2 and 2 and 2. We ask how could we record that? 4 + 2+2+2 = 10. First flash of the second image, Is it more or less than the first? How do you know? Second flash of the Quickphotos For Google 1 1 5 image, how many, how did you know? did you know it before I flashed it the second time? I would imagine most would do 10 + 2 very quickly and know it before the second flash. Could be cool to ask how we could use 14 counters in the next image and have them design the 14th.
After chatting with Elham, Graham, and Andrew, it was interesting to see the different ways we each looked at the images. (Joe Schwartz conveyed his thoughts to Graham, so I was able to hear those as well) There were distinct differences of when the color of the dot mattered to each of us and when it didnt as well as a difference of how we arranged the dots to make them easier to count.
These were the things that jumped out at me when I counted each one
Image 1: Color of the dots mattered. I saw red and yellow, 4+5=9. The arrangement made no difference to me.
Spin palace casino online . Image 2: Color was irrelevant to me. I squished it together to make is a 3 x4 array with one missing. Arrangement mattered here and I built up to the total.
Edgeview 2 v2 62 . Image 3: Again, color irrelevant to me. I saw the array and subtracted out the missing parts.
Image 4: I didnt know what to do with but the colors played an important way in which I saw the total. I needed to have those reds to easily see how many missing dots I had to subtract out from my total. So in this one arrangement and color both mattered.
Now, in planning to use this with a third grade class who have not officially started their unit on multiplication and arrays, I was curious most about how they would approach the 3rd and 4th image. Because I wanted to push them to be thinking about combining without having to count by ones, I decided to do them as quick images where I flashed the image for about 3-5 seconds and then covered it back up. I did that twice before taking any answers. In the 3rd image, I wanted to see if the colors of the counters made any difference to them or the arrangement was more important. How did they see the dots and how did they combine and then talk about the way they combined?
The 4th image, I will be honest, I didnt know what to do with it at first. I knew I couldnt spend the entire class period with it up there because it was a part of a number talk that I wanted to take about 15 minutes. I had to think about what I really wanted to see the students thinking about when looking at the image. Four things came to mind Quickphotos For Google 1 1 50
Could they come up with an estimate after one flash of the image or two?
What did they look for when given two flashes of the image. Were they counting rows and columns like the work they would soon be doing in the array work of the multiplication unit?
What did they look for on the second flash? Were they looking for the missing pieces first or second?
Could the students be metacognitive to think about what they were doing each time the image flashed and understand how they counted each time?
I had the chance to go into the classroom, do the Quick Images and film it! Because of time and length of this post already, I am going to leave you with this planning stage and post what I saw tomorrow!
In the meantime, you can play around with what you think 3rd graders would do with these images OR suggest other ways we could use them at various grade levels! Quickphotos For Google 1 1 5th
To be continued.
